The Journal of Pain

Objective: Myofascial pain (MP) is a leading cause of disability globally. Pain quality and severity vary widely for people with MP, making it difficult to accurately assess the spectrum of symptoms and develop appropriate treatments. We assessed potential contributors to variability in the clinical spectrum of unexplained neck/shoulder pain and associated myofascial component(s). Design: Prospective cross-sectional study of adults reporting neck/shoulder pain and pain-free individuals. Outcomes Measures: Pain intensity and interference (PEG); Symptom burden measured using patient-reported outcomes and objective measures: pain catastrophizing (PCS); PROMIS physical function (PF); sleep disturbance; anxiety (GAD-2); depression (PHQ-2); hypermobility (Beighton/Brighton); Objective measures in the medial upper trapezius: pressure pain threshold (PPT) and quantitative sensory testing (QST). Results: Of the 96 adults recruited for the study, 82 had complete records (age 32.2 +/-13.1 years, 57% women). On physical exam, 23 were assessed to be in an active group (those with spontaneous MP without provocation), 38 in a latent group (those with MP upon provocation), and 21 in a normal group (no MP in neck and shoulder). The symptom burden explained 75% of the variance in PEG in the overall sample, 85% in the active group and 92% in the normal group. PF and PCS are key predictors of PEG. Network analysis identified unique symptom clusters in the active and latent groups. Conclusions: The symptom burden explains the variability in the clinical spectrum of pain intensity and interference in unexplained neck/shoulder MP. Network analysis can further improve clinical risk stratification. These findings represent a step towards an eventual goal of developing multidisciplinary clinical guidance for managing the whole patient, rather than the current emphasis on regional pain contributors in MP.

Deficient descending pain inhibition assessed by conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is considered a common feature of various chronic pain disorders. Typically, CPM studies focus on one particular disorder making direct comparisons between disorders difficult. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare CPM effects between three clearly distinct chronic pain disorders and pain-free controls. Furthermore, patients were pooled with controls to explore whether subgroups showing different CPM effects could be separated independent of cohort membership. One hundred and forty participants (patients: 53 non-specific chronic low back pain [nsCLBP], 15 complex regional pain syndrome [CRPS], 14 neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury [painSCI]; 58 controls) were included. CPM effects were assessed in a remote, pain-free area using pressure pain thresholds as test stimulus and a cold water bath as conditioning stimulus. Cohort differences in CPM effects were analyzed using linear mixed models. The presence of subgroups showing different CPM effects was tested using latent class linear mixed models. CPM effects differed between cohorts (p = 0.011), driven mainly by reduced inhibitory CPM effects in patients with nsCLBP compared to patients with painSCI. Latent class analysis detected 3 subgroups with varying degrees of significant inhibitory CPM effects (ps [≤] 0.002). All subgroups comprised patients and controls. These results oppose deficient descending pain inhibition as a common feature of chronic pain disorders. Additionally, the failure to identify subgroups without inhibitory CPM effects within a heterogenous patient/control sample challenges the utility of deficient CPM as predictor of chronic pain or treatment efficacy. PerspectiveInhibitory conditioned pain modulation, a measure of descending pain inhibition, is not consistently impaired across distinct chronic pain disorders. Furthermore, identifying individuals with impaired conditioned pain modulation within a heterogenous sample is difficult. Thus, for conditioned pain modulation to be clinically useful, its variability needs to be better understood.

Objective: To evaluate whether glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are associated with improvements in pain severity, disability, quality of life, and physical function in adults with obesity and chronic low back pain (cLBP), and to explore potential mechanisms. Design: Prospective, single-arm cohort study. Subjects: Thirty-five adults (median age 41 years; 86% women) with obesity (median BMI 39.9 kg/m2) and cLBP initiating GLP-1 RAs (tirzepatide, n=24; semaglutide, n=11). Methods: Participants completed questionnaires at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The primary outcome was Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) pain severity. Secondary outcomes included body mass index (BMI), BPI-SF pain interference, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-12 (SF-12). At baseline and 6 months, a subset (n=24) underwent quantitative sensory testing, physical performance testing, and blood draws for inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein, TNF-, IL-6, IL-10), adipokines (leptin, adiponectin), and hemoglobin A1c. Results: Over 12 months, BMI decreased by 12.5% (median 39.9 to 34.9 kg/m2, 95% CI [-6.6, -4.2]). BPI-SF pain severity improved (median 4.8 to 2.0, 95% CI [-2.1, -0.8]), as did pain interference, ODI, NRS back pain, and SF-12 physical component scores. Hemoglobin A1c, leptin, and C-reactive protein decreased. Adiponectin increased and physical performance improved, but neither reached significance. Experimental pain sensitivity was unchanged. Conclusions: GLP-1 RAs were associated with clinically meaningful improvements in pain, disability, and quality of life. These findings suggest GLP-1 RAs may be a promising nonsurgical therapy for cLBP; randomized controlled trials are needed to establish causality and mechanisms.

High-impact chronic pain (HICP), defined as persistent pain that substantially limits daily activities, affects millions of adults and poses a public health challenge. Yet relatively little is known about how HICP manifests in people's daily lives. To address this gap, this study used the comprehensive Ecological Momentary Assessment of pain (cEMAp) to assess pain-related experiences four times per day over 7 days in individuals with chronic low back pain. Based on the classification using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised, we compared individuals with HICP (n = 66) with those in the next most severe pain category, bothersome chronic pain (n = 41), defined as having similar pain frequency but less frequent interference with daily activities. On each prompt, participants completed 2-hour assessments of pain intensity, interference, catastrophizing, behaviors, coping strategies, and pain characteristics. In line with prior research, both groups reported similar pain intensity levels, but the HICP group reported more frequent interference with physical, mental, and social activities. There were no group differences in daily mood or catastrophizing. Exploratory analyses suggested that many daily experiences were similar across groups, with differences observed in selected pain qualities, coping strategies, and pain behaviors. Additional analyses of response distributions showed some similarity across groups in many experiences. Overall, although individuals with HICP on average experience higher pain interference in daily life, levels of many day-to-day experiences are similar between the two groups. Data obtained with cEMAp complement traditional retrospective assessment by providing a detailed view of chronic pain in everyday life.

Pain is commonly described in sensory terms, yet its spatial characteristics-localization and distribution-are rarely quantified. We investigated whether lay beliefs about pain distribution (PD) influence theoretical decisions to seek care and treatment preferences. In a representative cross-sectional survey (N=503; 49% with pain), participants completed thought experiments in which both visually presented PD patterns (small, moderate or large) and pain intensity (NRS 2, 5, 8/10) were systemically varied. For each scenario, they rated the likelihood of (i) seeking professional help (LoSH) and (ii) taking analgesic medication (LoTM). Participants also completed a spatial-intensity trade-off task (SITT), in which they chose between a fixed 20% reduction in intensity and variable reductions in PD (20-80%). A reversed version contrasted a fixed 80% reduction in PD with variable reductions in pain intensity. LoSH and LoTM increased significantly with greater PD (p<0.001), mirroring the gradient observed for pain intensity. In the SITT, participants' choice followed a sigmoid-like function (p<0.001): 1% reduction in intensity was treated as equivalent to approximately a 3% reduction in distribution, indicating a systematic valuation of PD. This ratio was lower in individuals experiencing pain compared to pain-free individuals. Moreover, 63% reported that PD should be routinely considered in pain management alongside intensity. Results suggest that PD is not merely a trivial descriptor, but a meaningful determinant of healthcare-related decision-making beliefs. Incorporating spatial metrics into clinical assessment and research may better capture how individuals implicitly evaluate pain severity.

Objective: To quantify the effect size of four biopsychosocial amplifier loops on chronic pain outcomes through systematic review and meta-analysis, and to develop a logistic regression-based risk stratification tool for interventional pain medicine. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library through March 2026 for studies reporting adjusted odds ratios for associations between (1) sleep disturbance, (2) pain catastrophizing, (3) metabolic/inflammatory markers, (4) preoperative opioid use/polypharmacy, and chronic pain chronification or treatment failure. Random-effects meta-analyses (DerSimonian-Laird) were performed for each loop. Effect sizes were translated into a composite logistic regression model, the Pain Amplifier Loop Framework (PALF), using ln(OR) as first-order coefficient approximations. Results: Forty-four studies with over 500,000 participants were included. Pooled odds ratios were: sleep disturbance OR=1.80 (95% CI 1.65-1.96; k=16), pain catastrophizing OR=2.11 (95% CI 1.71-2.61; k=8), metabolic/fat mass OR=2.02 (95% CI 1.32-3.09; k=7), preoperative opioid use OR=4.48 (95% CI 2.87-6.97; k=6), and opioid-benzodiazepine co-prescription OR=2.62 (95% CI 1.76-3.89; k=7). All four loops converge on TLR4/NF-kB microglial signaling. The PALF model produces a probability of interventional failure enabling stratification into low, moderate, and high risk categories. Conclusions: Four amplifier loops independently increase chronic pain risk. The PALF provides a transparent, clinically actionable risk score requiring prospective validation.

Neuropilin-1 (NRP1) is a single pass transmembrane glycoprotein that can form a receptor complex with several tyrosine kinase receptors, including the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor. Previous studies have reported that binding of VEGFA to this receptor complex elicits mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia through potentiation of voltage-gated sodium and calcium channel activity. We find that Nrp1 mRNA and protein is widely distributed in naIve mouse and rat DRG neurons, including peptidergic afferents. A CGRPcreER: NRP1fl/fl transgenic mice was generated to investigate the role of peptidergic NRP1 in basal nociception. Following in vivo loss of NRP1, mice are hyposensitive to both noxious heat and mechanical stimuli. Under normal conditions, VEGFA elicits mechanical hypersensitivity, an effect that was absent in our NRP1 knockout mouse. Furthermore, VEGFA induced neuronal hyperexcitability was lost in CGRP expressing neurons isolated from this NRP1 knockout mouse. This study validates the NRP1 knockout mouse and confirms previous findings that VEGFA, often released during pathological pain conditions, requires peptidergic NRP1. Interestingly, we find that in the absence of ongoing injury or inflammation, peptidergic NRP1 regulates basal nociception and pain-like behaviors. PerspectiveNRP1 is expressed in sensory neurons including the peptidergic subpopulation. Genetic deletion of NRP1 in healthy adults alters nociception without altering innervation; NRP1 knockout mice are hyposensitive to noxious heat and mechanical stimuli, but lose sensitivity to VEGFA, confirming it is a therapeutic target for growth factor mediated pain conditions.

Nav1.7 voltage-gated sodium channels are strongly expressed in human primary painsensing neurons (nociceptors) and selective Nav1.7 inhibitors have been developed as possible therapeutic agents for treating pain, so far with disappointing clinical results. In contrast, a selective Nav1.8 channel inhibitor (suzetrigine) has had successful clinical trials. Because nociceptors express both Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 channels, it is of interest to compare effects of Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 inhibitors on the excitability of human nociceptors. To compare with previous results with suzetrigine, we characterized the effects of a selective Nav.7 inhibitor, AM-2099, on action potential generation and repetitive firing of dissociated human dorsal root ganglion neurons, studied at 37{degrees}C. Inhibition of Nav1.7 channels by 600 nM AM-2099 generally produced a substantial depolarizing shift of action potential threshold, an increase in rheobase, a decrease in action potential upstroke velocity, decrease in action potential peak, and prolongation of refractory period. Compared to inhibition of Nav1.8 channels, inhibition of Nav1.7 channels had larger effects on threshold and maximal upstroke velocity, while action potential peak was reduced similarly by both. Nav1.8 inhibition produced much more dramatic reduction of repetitive firing than Nav1.7 inhibition. The results show that although the excitability of human DRG neurons is affected by inhibition of Nav1.7 channels, most notably by an increase in threshold and increase in refractory period, repetitive firing of the neurons in response to strong stimuli is little affected. Significance statementNav1.7 sodium channels are highly expressed in primary pain-sensing neurons and humans with null mutations in Nav1.7 channels have loss of pain sensation. However, unlike the Nav1.8 inhibitor suzetrigine, Nav1.7 inhibitors have so far not reached clinical use. We compared effects of Nav1.7 on electrical excitability of human dorsal root ganglion neurons with those of suzetrigine and found that while Nav1.7 inhibition affects spike threshold more than suzetrigine, there is little effect on repetitive firing with strong stimuli.

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects up to 26% of women worldwide. While its pathophysiology is poorly understood, disturbances in body perception have been identified in various similar chronic musculoskeletal disorders. The Fremantle Perineal Awareness Questionnaire (FrePAQ) is a novel tool designed to specifically assess disturbed body perception in the pelvic region, but its structural validity and reliability require formal evaluation. Methods: Patient partners with lived experience contributed to study design. Participants with (n=417 and without (n=277) chronic pelvic pain completed the FrePAQ at baseline, as well as one week later. We assessed the validity and reliability of the FrePAQ following COSMIN guidelines for Classical Test Theory. Results: The validated FrePAQ comprises a two factor model, with a six item Distress & Disconnection (D&D) subscale and a two item Size & Shape (S&S) subscale. Confirmatory analysis showed excellent fit (CFI = .988; RMSEA = .048) and measurement invariance between diagnostic groups. Internal consistency was high (cronbach alpha = .838 CPP, .819 controls). Test retest reliability was high for D&D (ICC = .863) and acceptable for S&S (ICC = .695). FrePAQ scores showed a weak to moderate correlation with pain scores (r = .234 to .255), psychological distress (r = .226 to .443), and functional impact (r = .172 to .295), particularly for the D&D subscale. Conclusion: The FrePAQ is a reliable and valid instrument to measure perineal perceptual disturbances in CPP. Future research will evaluate the tools potential to support phenotyping and guide individualised interventions. Improved understanding of body perception disturbance in CPP can enhance diagnosis and treatment precision.

Background: Psychedelics are emerging as potential management options for chronic musculoskeletal pain due to preliminary evidence of effectiveness and low addictive potential, but patients perceptions remain unknown. This study assessed patient perceptions regarding psilocybin for musculoskeletal pain. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of adults ([&ge;]19) with musculoskeletal pain attending a hospital-based orthopaedic clinic. Participants reported demographics, perceptions of psychedelics for pain management, and willingness to participate in psychedelic research. Multivariable regression explored factors associated with perceived analgesic potential, and willingness to try a full therapeutic dose of psilocybin or a microdose. Results: Among 295 participants, 73% reported moderate-to-severe pain; 75% used analgesics; of these, 41% used opioids (86/209). While 24% reported prior psychedelic use, only 3% had discussed psychedelics with a healthcare provider. Most perceived that psilocybin had moderate-to-high effectiveness for pain (76%). Most respondents endorsed a moderate-to-high willingness to try microdoses (58%) and macrodoses (53%) of psilocybin for pain. Prior non-therapeutic psychedelic use predicted a 1.05-unit increase in perceived analgesic potential on the 10-point scale (p=.013). Willingness to try a macrodose of psilocybin was most strongly associated with prior non-therapeutic (B=3.16) and therapeutic (B=2.42) psychedelic use; in contrast, pain severity had a significant but modest association, with a 0.21-point increase in willingness for every 1-unit increase in pain severity (p=.017). Similarly, willingness to try a microdose of psilocybin was predicted by non-therapeutic (B=2.82) and therapeutic (B=2.48) use, whereas the effects of pain severity (B=0.20) and younger age (B=-0.30) were significant but small. Most respondents (52%) reported moderate-to-high willingness to participate in a trial of psilocybin for pain relief, and health risks were the primary concern (33%). Conclusions: Study findings suggest a majority hold neutral-to-positive perceptions of psilocybin for pain. Addressing perceived barriers, including health effects and gaps in patient knowledge, should be considered when designing future trials.

BackgroundAcute postoperative pain remains a major clinical therapeutic challenge. Current peripheral nerve blockade (PNB) techniques are effective for some patients but are limited by invasiveness, short duration, reliance on highly trained providers, and off-target motor and sensory effects. Focused ultrasound (FUS) is a novel neuromodulatory technology with the potential to achieve noninvasive, selective, reversible, and prolonged inhibition of peripheral nociceptive fibers to prevent and treat acute pain. We hypothesized that noninvasive transcutaneous targeting of the rat sciatic nerve using co-aligned diagnostic ultrasound (dUS) and FUS transducers could produce selective and reversible inhibition of nociceptive pain behaviors while preserving motor and non-nociceptive sensory functions. MethodsIn an in vivo rat hindpaw incisional (HPI) pain model, using a novel, transcutaneous dUS-guided FUS system, the sciatic nerve was located with dUS, and FUS energy was applied to it just prior to hindpaw incision. FUS parameters were iteratively adjusted to achieve reversible, selective inhibition of nociceptive behaviors without changing motor and non-pain sensory behaviors. Animals were randomized into six groups: No Intervention (Control), HPI Only (Disease Control), Sham FUS, FUS Only, FUS+HPI (Intervention), and LA+HPI (Positive Control). Primary outcomes were changes in nociceptive sensory functions, assessed by thermal and mechanical sensitivity. Secondary outcomes were changes in non-nociceptive sensory and motor functions, assessed by hindpaw flexion and extension reflexes. ResultsCompared with the HPI Only group, the FUS+HPI group demonstrated (1) significant attenuation of hindpaw thermal hypersensitivity from day 0 - week 5.0 and week 8.0 - 16.0 (p < 0.05-0.001); (2) significant attenuation of mechanical hypersensitivity from day 0 until week 4.0 (p < 0.05-0.001); (3) no significant attenuation of flexion; and (4) no significant attenuation of extension. ConclusionsTranscutaneous dUS-guided FUS enables selective, reversible inhibition of A{delta} and C nociceptive fiber mediated behaviors while sparing A motor and A{beta} sensory behaviors. FUS-induced PNB prevented both acute and persistent pain behaviors. These findings support FUS as a promising noninvasive peripheral nerve blockade strategy for acute pain management.

Introduction: Reduced or lost sensation and movement after a spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs the brain s ability to accurately localize paralyzed body parts, causing deficits in its internal body map, or mental body representations (MBR). These deficits hinder functional recovery and contribute to neuropathic pain. Medications for neuropathic pain are often ineffective and carry side effects. Our pilot trials found that in-person Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation (CMR), a physical therapy restoring MBR, led to prolonged pain reduction, improved sensorimotor function, and enhanced brain function, to greater extent than adaptive fitness. To explore more accessible interventions for those in rural areas or with transportation challenges, we examined whether 12 weeks of remotely delivered CMR or exercise would (1) improve function and reduce pain; (2) increase brain activity and connectivity related to sensorimotor function and MBR in adults with SCI. Methods: Of 19 adults with SCI who consented, 15 (51+/-15 years old, 8+/-10 years post-SCI) were randomized to 12 weeks of remotely delivered CMR or exercise (45min, 3x/week). Eight reported neuropathic pain equal or greater than 3/10. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), and Neuromuscular Recovery Scale (NRS) assessed pain and sensorimotor function at baseline, post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up. Functional MRI included resting-state and four tasks: imagining feeling the left leg, imagining moving the left leg, whole-body movement imagery, and a sensation task. Results: After CMR (n=8), participants improved on AIS (large effect sizes: touch: d=1.30; pinprick: d=1.21; lower limb motor function: d=1.83). Exercise (n=7) produced smaller improvements (touch: d=0.35; pinprick: d=0.36; lower limb motor function: d=0.80). CMR showed greater NRS effect sizes (core: d=1.48; upper limb: d=0.69; lower limb: d=1.25) than exercise (core: d=0.31; upper limb: d=0.74; lower limb: d=0.83). Benefits persisted at follow-up for both AIS and NRS, especially in the CMR group. Highest neuropathic pain intensity decreased in both groups post-intervention (CMR: d=-0.61; exercise: d=-0.73) and at 6-month follow-up (CMR: d=-0.55; exercise: d=-0.55). Unlike previous studies, group effects for CMR were not found due to high heterogeneity. Increased task-based activation, including in the lateral occipital cortex involved in visual body perception and spatial awareness, was seen for the exercise group (n=5). Discussion: These preliminary results support the potential of remotely delivered CMR and exercise to improve function and reduce neuropathic pain in adults with SCI, highlighting the need for larger trials. Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT05870189

Introduction: Acute low back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Clinical guidelines recommend non-pharmacological therapies as first-line treatment and advise caution with opioid prescribing. However pharmacological therapies, including opioids and gabapentinoids, remain commonly used. The comparative risks of subsequent opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose diagnosis associated with initial treatment modality in large, real-world populations is not well characterized. We estimated the incidence of new-onset OUD and overdose diagnosis among opioid-naive, Medicaid-insured adults with newly diagnosed acute low back pain and estimated the association between initial treatment modalities and subsequent OUD and overdose diagnosis risk. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Medicaid T-MSIS Analytic files from 25 states (2016-2019). We identified opioid-naive adults with a new diagnosis of acute low back pain who initiated pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic treatment within 1 month of diagnosis. The primary outcome was incident OUD and overdose diagnosis (based on diagnosis codes in claims) during follow-up. Associations between initial treatment modality and OUD and overdose diagnosis risk were estimated using a non-parametric, doubly robust estimator to adjust for measured confounding. Results: The cohort included 525,002 opioid-naive adults initiating treatment for low back pain. The cumulative incidence of OUD and overdose diagnosis was 1.5% and 2.4% at 7 and 13 months, respectively. Compared to non-use, use of gabapentinoids during the first month of treatment was associated with the highest relative risk (increasing risk) by 130.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 117.8%, 142.3%), the second-highest relative risk was estimated for higher-dose opioids, defined as > 50 daily Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) (118.1%, 95% CI: 99.2%, 137.0%). Lower-dose, short-duration opioids ([&le;] 50 MME, [&le;] 7 days) were also associated with elevated risk, though substantially smaller in magnitude (20.8%, 95% CI: 13.8%, 27.9%). In contrast, non-pharmacologic, non-interventional therapies were associated with reduced OUD and overdose diagnosis risk, with physical therapy demonstrating the largest relative reduction of 34.0% (95% CI: -40.9%, -27.1%). Discussion: In opioid-naive Medicaid patients with acute low back pain, initial non-pharmacologic treatment was associated with reduced OUD and overdose diagnosis risk. Gabapentinoids and opioids were each associated with increased risk; for opioids, the degree of risk increased with higher doses and durations. These results support guideline recommendations favoring non-pharmacologic treatment as first-line therapy and indicate the importance of cautious prescribing when pharmacologic treatment is considered.

Background: Spinal pain, including neck pain and low back pain (LBP), is a common musculoskeletal condition and major contributor to disability worldwide. Evidence comparing disability, fatigue and mental health across acute and chronic stages remains limited, particularly in conflict-affected and low-resource settings. This study assessed these outcomes among patients with acute and chronic neck pain and LBP in the Gaza Strip. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among 410 adults attending outpatient physical therapy at Nasser Medical Complex, Khan Younis, Gaza Strip. Participants included 204 with neck pain and 206 with LBP, classified as acute neck pain (n=101), chronic neck pain (n=103), acute LBP (n=102) and chronic LBP (n=104). Disability, fatigue, psychological distress and sleep disturbance were assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI)/Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) and PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8a. Independent t-tests, adjusted linear regression, correlation analyses, clinical-threshold analyses and binary logistic regression were performed. Results: Chronic neck pain and chronic LBP were associated with significantly higher disability, fatigue and psychological distress than acute pain. Chronic neck pain patients had higher NDI, FSS and PHQ-4 scores than acute neck pain patients; chronic LBP patients had higher ODI, FSS and PHQ-4 scores than acute LBP patients (all p<0.001). Sleep disturbance did not differ significantly between groups. Female participants reported higher psychological distress in both pain groups, with higher fatigue in neck pain and higher disability in LBP. Adjusted analyses confirmed that chronic pain status remained associated with higher disability, fatigue and psychological distress. Fatigue was the most consistent factor independently associated with chronic pain status. Conclusions: Chronic spinal pain was associated with greater disability, fatigue and psychological distress than acute spinal pain, while sleep disturbance was common across groups. These findings support early multidimensional assessment, including screening for fatigue and psychological distress. Longitudinal studies are needed to clarify whether these factors contribute to transition from acute to chronic spinal pain.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is persistent and refractory, affecting 20-30% of population worldwide. Neurofeedback has been explored as a potential non-pharmacological intervention for chronic pain, although evidence in CLBP remains limited. This study evaluated PainWaive, a consumer-grade digitally-delivered neurofeedback intervention targeting multiple pain-related frequency bands recorded over the sensorimotor cortex in individuals with CLBP. In a multiple-baseline experimental design, four participants completed daily assessments of pain severity and pain interference during randomly-assigned baseline phases of 7, 10, 14, and 20 days, followed by 20 sessions of the PainWaive intervention over four weeks. Daily pain assessments continued during the post-intervention and follow-up phases. Participants rated PainWaive's usability and acceptability at post-intervention. Anxiety, depression, wellbeing, and sleep disturbance were assessed at three timepoints. Aggregated Tau-U analyses indicated a large effect (-0.67) on pain severity from baseline to intervention and very large from baseline to post-intervention (-0.92) and follow-up (-0.92) phases. Large effects (-0.63, -0.62, and -0.70) were also observed for pain interference. Individual-level analyses showed significant reductions across all participants, with visual inspection confirming progressive decreases over time. The intervention was rated usable and acceptable by all participants, while psychological outcomes were mixed and varied across participants. The findings provide promising evidence that the PainWaive neurofeedback intervention may reduce pain severity and pain interference in some individuals with CLBP. By prioritising accessibility, usability, and self-administration, PainWaive supports a foundation for more patient-centred, technology-enabled approaches to chronic pain management. Further evaluation of this approach in randomised trials is required to establish efficacy.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterised by chronic pain, a debilitating symptom for which effective treatments are few and far between. IBD pathogenesis includes the prevalence of a variety of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including the Interleukin-6 (IL-6) family members Il-6 and Oncostatin M (OSM). Previous research has shown disruption of OSM signaling can modulate nociceptor sensitization and activation, however the downstream signalling pathway is unknown. When an in silico analysis of murine colonic sensory neuronal populations was undertaken for receptor expression for OSM and other factors necessary for intracellular signaling, we can find diverse expression indicative of functional signaling. We were able to observe that hyper Il-6 (Il-6 bound to the soluble Il-6 receptor) and OSM can elicit activation of a subset of murine sensory neurons by finding an increase in calcium mobilization following superfusion. This could then be attenuated by the pharmacologic inhibition of all janus kinases or interestingly, TYK2 alone. Furthermore, inhibition of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 or transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 ion channels, which are known to be sensitized by OSM in other sensory neurons also reduced the proportion of OSM-responsive neurons. This further understanding of OSM signaling in sensory neurons creates avenues for more extensive research into the molecular mechanisms occurring as well as the potential to exploit these therapeutically to induce analgesia in a subset of neurons.

Neuropathic pain (NP) affects approximately 60% of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Existing pharmacological treatments provide only modest relief and are often limited by adverse effects, while non-pharmacological options show small effects at best. As such, there remains a need for accessible, mechanism-informed treatments for SCI-NP. This protocol describes a trial evaluating two promising home-based neuromodulatory interventions for SCI-NP - electroencephalography neurofeedback (EEG-NF) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) - tested both independently and when applied in combination. We will employ a partially double-blinded (i.e. 1 treatment blinded, the other not), 2x2 factorial randomised controlled trial. Adults with chronic SCI-NP (N=192) will be randomised to: (1) EEG-NF + active tDCS, (2) EEG-NF + sham tDCS, (3) active tDCS alone, or (4) sham tDCS alone, in addition to treatment as usual. Participants will complete 20 home-based sessions over 5 weeks. The primary outcome is change in overall pain severity with the primary endpoint being 6 weeks post-randomisation, with secondary endpoints at 16, 26 and 52 weeks post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes (worst pain intensity, pain interference, sleep, depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life) will be assessed at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks post-randomisation. This will be the first large-scale trial of home-based EEG-NF and tDCS for SCI-NP. If found to be effective, these scalable interventions could be integrated into routine care and inform further optimisation of neuromodulation strategies for managing SCI-NP.

Cognitive dysfunction is increasingly recognized as an important feature of chronic pain (CP). However, subjective cognitive complaints and objectively measured cognitive performance frequently diverge. Whether and how these two aspects of cognitive functioning differentially relate to the broad symptomatology and brain function in CP remains unclear. Here, 114 individuals with CP completed patient-reported outcome measures on cognitive functioning and multidimensional CP symptoms, as well as a visuospatial working memory task, and resting-state EEG. Bayesian correlations, network analyses, and Bayesian regression models examined how subjective and objective cognitive functioning relate to multidimensional CP symptoms and EEG activity/connectivity, while controlling for age and sex. Additional models tested whether EEG associations were independent of broader symptom burden. Results indicated that subjective and objective cognitive functioning were uncorrelated. Subjective cognitive functioning was strongly associated with psychosocial symptoms, whereas objective cognitive functioning was largely independent of broader symptom burden. EEG revealed associations between subjective cognitive functioning and bilateral frontotemporal beta connectivity; however, these relationships were substantially attenuated after accounting for broader CP symptom burden. Objective cognitive functioning showed no robust associations with EEG. These findings indicate a dissociation between subjective cognitive complaints and objective cognitive performance in CP. Subjective cognitive complaints were primarily associated with psychosocial symptom burden and beta-band hypoconnectivity. In contrast, objective cognitive performance was unrelated to the broader symptomatology of CP and EEG measures. This dissociation may inform more targeted interventions, optimize the allocation of cognitive assessment resources, and ultimately improve long-term functional outcomes in CP.

Background Social disconnection has emerged as a major public health concern, with health risks comparable to established biomedical factors. At the same time, pain remains the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide, imposing profound individual and societal costs. Although social factors are increasingly implicated in pain perception and chronification, existing evidence is fragmented across heterogeneous and often conflated constructs of social connectedness. It remains unclear whether subjective experiences such as loneliness or structural factors such as social isolation differentially relate to pain outcomes. A comprehensive synthesis directly comparing these dimensions has been lacking. Methods We conducted a preregistered multivariate meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420250643896) including 239 studies, 520 effect sizes, and 1,407,803 participants from clinical and non-clinical populations. Pain outcomes encompassed sensory, affective, cognitive, and functional domains. Social connectedness was operationalized as loneliness, social isolation, social support, and social exclusion. Multilevel random-effects models accounted for within-study dependency, with extensive sensitivity analyses and correction for small-study bias. Results Across populations and social outcomes, greater social connectedness was associated with lower pain (z = -0.09, 95% CI -0.11 to -0.07). Notably, loneliness emerged as the strongest correlate (z = 0.14, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.17). Associations with social isolation were smaller compared to loneliness but were also significant (z = 0.09, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.13). Social support showed modest, significant inverse associations (z = -0.05, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.03), primarily confined to affective and somatic pain components. No reliable association was observed for social exclusion. Associations were consistent across age, sex, and clinical status, and longitudinal evidence supported temporal links between changes in social connectedness and subsequent pain outcomes. Conclusions This large-scale synthesis identifies subjective social disconnection, particularly loneliness, as a robust correlate of pain across populations and pain dimensions, exceeding the relevance of objective social isolation. Given evidence linking loneliness to increased analgesic and psychotropic medication use, social disconnection may contribute to pharmacological burden and polypharmacy risk in vulnerable populations. Social connectedness emerges as a clinically meaningful, non-pharmacological determinant of pain and a potential target for integrative pain prevention and management strategies.

Objective: To quantify the effect size of four biopsychosocial amplifier loops on chronic pain outcomes through systematic review and meta-analysis, and to propose a composite meta-analytic risk index for interventional pain medicine requiring prospective validation. Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library through March 2026 for studies reporting adjusted odds ratios linking (1) sleep disturbance, (2) pain catastrophizing, (3) metabolic/inflammatory markers, and (4) preoperative opioid use/polypharmacy to chronic pain chronification or treatment failure. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analyses were performed per loop. Publication bias was assessed via Egger's test (k>=8). Effect sizes were integrated into a logistic regression model--the Pain Amplifier Loop Framework (PALF). Neurobiological convergence on TLR4/NF-kB microglial signaling was examined. Results: Forty-four studies (>500,000 participants) were included. Pooled odds ratios: sleep disturbance 1.80 (95% CI 1.65-1.96; k=16; I2=51%), pain catastrophizing 2.11 (1.71-2.61; k=8; I2=0%), metabolic/fat mass 2.02 (1.32-3.09; k=7), preoperative opioid use 4.48 (2.87-6.97; k=6; I2=84%), and opioid-benzodiazepine co-prescription 2.62 (1.76-3.89; k=7; I2=79%). Egger's test showed no significant asymmetry for sleep (p=0.21) or catastrophizing (p=0.84). All loops converge on TLR4/NF-kB microglial signaling. The PALF yields a Systemic Load Score and failure probability P=1/(1+e^-theta), enabling low (<0.30), moderate (0.30-0.60), and high (>=0.60) risk stratification. Conclusions: Four biopsychosocial amplifier loops independently and substantially increase chronic pain risk. The PALF proposes a transparent, hypothesis-driven composite risk index anchored in meta-analytic evidence from >500,000 participants. As a meta-analytic synthesis rather than a fitted prediction model, the PALF requires prospective multicenter validation with individual patient data before clinical application.